Academic Writing music

The paper should be typed, double-spaced, in a Times New Roman or Cambria 12pt. font. And sources you use need to be cited in accordance with the most recent edition of the Turabian Style Guide. Write a 4-5 page paper investigating the points that the question asks you to address. Feel free to draw on your personal experience. However, your approach is to be analytic and critical in orientation: in other words, you should not just present me with a set of emotive assertions, for that does not prove any kind of proper intellectual engagement, which is what the aim of the exercise is. You need to use analysis of the music you are discussing to support your points I have not particularly made a case for distinguishing my discussions of music into the supposedly distinct categories of “popular music” and “classical music.” This said, if asked, most of us would be able to distinguish the two musics from each other. And indeed, these two different categories often seem to inspire very different listening habits amongst their respective audiences. At a “classical music” concert, it is nearly always customary to sit still, be quiet, not to engage directly or overtly with the performers, and only show one’s appreciation (or not) after the performance is over. By contrast, at a rock music concert, for example, the performers will usually consider themselves to have failed if the audience sits still, remains quiet, and only claps politely after each song. Discuss both advantages and also disadvantages that can arise from the upholding of this distinction between “popular” and “classical” music.